Feature Analytics

Feature analytics provide deep insights into how schools adopt, use, and derive value from YeboLearn's 15+ features. This data drives product roadmap decisions, feature optimization, and go-to-market strategy.

Feature Portfolio Overview

All Features Summary

Active Features: 15 core features + 6 add-ons

Feature Category	Features	Avg Adoption	Avg Usage/Week	Revenue Impact
AI-Powered (6)	Lesson Planner, Quiz Gen, Auto-Grade, etc	70%	23.4 uses	High
Core Platform (5)	Dashboard, Progress, Resources, etc	82%	18.6 uses	Essential
Collaboration (2)	Parent Portal, Live Collab	51%	2.9 uses	Medium
Analytics (2)	Student Analytics, Curriculum Align	62%	7.1 uses	Medium

Feature Adoption Distribution:

Features Used per School (Monthly Average)
1-2 features:  18 schools (12%) - Low engagement
3-4 features:  40 schools (28%) - Moderate
5-7 features:  52 schools (36%) - Good
8-10 features: 25 schools (17%) - High
11+ features:  10 schools (7%)  - Power users

Top Features Deep-Dive

1. AI Lesson Planner

Adoption: 128 schools (88% of active schools)

Usage Metrics:

Weekly active users: 1,245 teachers
Avg uses per teacher/week: 3.8 lessons
Total lessons generated/month: 18,960
Avg time saved per lesson: 28 minutes
Total time saved: 8,848 hours/month

Engagement Patterns:

Day of Week	Lessons Created	% of Weekly Total
Sunday	3,420	18% (weekend planning)
Monday	4,180	22% (week prep)
Tuesday	2,850	15%
Wednesday	2,470	13%
Thursday	2,090	11%
Friday	1,710	9%
Saturday	2,240	12%

Peak Usage Times: Sunday 6pm-10pm, Monday 6am-9am

Feature Flow:

Start Lesson → AI Generation → Review/Edit → Save → Share
100%           95%              88%           85%    42%

Drop-off Analysis:
- 5% abandon during generation (timeout or dissatisfaction)
- 7% abandon after review (not meeting needs)
- 3% don't save (just exploring)
- 43% save but don't share (personal use only)

Customization Usage:

Use templates: 68%
Customize AI output: 82%
Add own content: 55%
Align to curriculum: 73%

Quality Ratings (User Feedback):

5 stars: 58%
4 stars: 28%
3 stars: 10%
2 stars: 3%
1 star: 1%
Average: 4.7/5.0

Impact on Retention: Schools using Lesson Planner weekly have 94% annual retention (vs 88% baseline)

Revenue Correlation: 85% of Enterprise tier schools are heavy Lesson Planner users

2. Smart Quiz Generator

Adoption: 118 schools (81% of active schools)

Usage Metrics:

Weekly active users: 1,080 teachers
Avg quizzes per teacher/week: 2.4
Total quizzes generated/month: 10,368
Avg questions per quiz: 15.2
Total questions generated/month: 157,594

Quiz Types Generated:

Quiz Type	% of Total	Avg Questions	Popularity Trend
Multiple Choice	45%	12.5	Stable
True/False	22%	18.0	Growing
Short Answer	18%	8.0	Growing
Fill-in-Blank	10%	10.5	Declining
Mixed Format	5%	20.0	Growing

Generation Time:

<10 questions: 8 seconds avg
10-20 questions: 15 seconds avg
20+ questions: 28 seconds avg
Target: ❤️ seconds per question (currently 1.5s avg)

Edit Rate: 76% of quizzes are edited after generation

Minor edits (1-2 changes): 42%
Moderate edits (3-5 changes): 28%
Major edits (6+ changes): 6%
Complete regeneration: 18%

Feature Performance:

Quiz Generation Success Rate: 96.8%
Failures by Reason:
- API timeout: 1.8%
- Invalid parameters: 0.9%
- Content policy violation: 0.3%
- System error: 0.2%

User Satisfaction: 4.5/5.0 average rating

Improvement Requests (Top 3):

Difficulty level control (requested by 42% of users)
More question types (35% of users)
Faster generation (28% of users)

3. Auto-Grading

Adoption: 112 schools (77% of active schools)

Usage Metrics:

Weekly active users: 980 teachers
Avg grading sessions/week: 8.2 per teacher
Total assignments graded/month: 32,032
Total student submissions graded: 284,850
Avg time saved per assignment: 45 minutes
Total time saved: 24,024 hours/month

Grading Types:

Type	% of Grading	Accuracy	Teacher Override Rate
Multiple Choice	52%	99.8%	0.2%
True/False	24%	99.9%	0.1%
Fill-in-Blank	12%	94.5%	5.5%
Short Answer (AI)	8%	87.2%	12.8%
Essay (AI)	4%	78.5%	21.5%

AI Grading Performance:

Objective questions: 99.8% accuracy
Short answer: 87.2% accuracy (teacher review recommended)
Essays: 78.5% accuracy (teacher review required)

Teacher Review Patterns:

Review all grades: 32%
Spot check (10-20%): 48%
Only review flagged: 18%
Trust fully: 2%

Time Savings:

Traditional Grading Time: 45 min/assignment
With Auto-Grading:       8 min/assignment
Time Saved:              37 min (82% reduction)

Monthly Impact per Teacher:
Assignments graded: 35
Time saved: 1,295 minutes (21.6 hours)
Value: $540/month at $25/hour teacher time

Feature Satisfaction: 4.6/5.0 (highest rated feature)

Retention Impact: 96% retention for schools using Auto-Grading weekly

4. Curriculum Alignment

Adoption: 106 schools (73% of active schools)

Usage Metrics:

Weekly active users: 850 teachers
Avg alignment checks/week: 6.3
Total lessons aligned/month: 21,420
Standards databases: 3 (South African CAPS, IEB, Cambridge)

Standards Usage:

Curriculum	Schools Using	% of Total	Lessons Aligned/Month
CAPS (South African)	92	87%	16,200
IEB	18	17%	3,840
Cambridge (IGCSE)	12	11%	1,380

Alignment Workflow:

Create Lesson → Auto-Suggest Standards → Review/Select → Save Alignment
100%            78%                       88%             82%

78% of lessons receive auto-suggested standards
88% of those suggestions are accepted with no changes
12% are modified or custom standards added

Impact on Lesson Quality:

Lessons with alignment: 4.5/5.0 avg rating
Lessons without: 3.8/5.0 avg rating
Improvement: +18% quality score

Use Cases:

Lesson planning: 58%
Reporting to administrators: 28%
Parent communication: 10%
Compliance documentation: 4%

Feature Requests:

Add more curricula (US Common Core, UK National Curriculum)
Multi-standard alignment (align to 2+ frameworks)
Curriculum gap analysis

5. Resource Library

Adoption: 98 schools (68% of active schools)

Usage Metrics:

Weekly active users: 745 teachers
Avg resources accessed/week: 4.8
Total resource downloads/month: 14,352
User-uploaded resources: 2,840
Platform resources: 8,500

Resource Types:

Type	Count	Downloads/Month	Avg Rating
Worksheets	3,200	5,280	4.3/5
Lesson Plans	2,850	4,420	4.5/5
Presentations	1,680	2,140	4.2/5
Videos	920	1,580	4.6/5
Assessments	640	932	4.4/5

Search Performance:

Avg search results: 24 resources
Click-through rate: 38%
Download rate after click: 65%
Resource not found rate: 8%

User-Generated Content:

Upload Activity:
Total uploads/month: 240 resources
Avg uploads/school: 2.4/month
Top uploaders: 5 schools (50+ resources each)

Quality Control:
Automated review: 100% (scan for policy violations)
Manual review: 15% (flagged for quality)
Approval rate: 94%
Rejection rate: 6% (inappropriate, low quality)

Sharing Behavior:

Keep private: 32%
Share with own school: 45%
Share with all schools: 23%

Monetization Opportunity: Premium resource marketplace (future consideration)

AI Feature Analytics

AI Usage Summary

AI-Powered Features: 6 features

Feature	Adoption	Weekly Uses	AI Cost/Month	Revenue/Month
AI Lesson Planner	88%	18,960	$7,450	$138,240
Smart Quiz Generator	81%	10,368	$5,280	$130,680
Auto-Grading (AI portion)	77%	3,840	$3,420	$120,960
Plagiarism Checker	61%	2,080	$730	$95,760
Writing Assistant	50%	3,280	$1,580	$85,500
Content Recommendations	47%	2,120	$740	$80,360
Total	70%	40,648	$19,200	$651,500

AI Economics:

Total AI cost: $19,200/month
Revenue from AI users: $178,500/month (102 schools × $1,750 avg)
AI cost as % of AI revenue: 10.8%
Profit margin on AI features: 89.2% (excellent)

AI Quality Metrics

Response Quality (User Ratings):

Feature	Avg Rating	5-Star %	1-Star %	Retry Rate
Lesson Planner	4.7/5	58%	1%	6.2%
Quiz Generator	4.5/5	48%	2%	8.4%
Auto-Grading	4.6/5	52%	1%	3.8%
Plagiarism Checker	4.3/5	38%	3%	12.5%
Writing Assistant	4.4/5	42%	2%	9.2%
Content Recommendations	4.1/5	32%	4%	15.8%

Retry Rate: Percentage of users regenerating output (indicates initial dissatisfaction)

AI Performance Targets:

Average rating: >4.5/5 (currently 4.4/5)
5-star percentage: >50% (currently 45%)
Retry rate: <8% (currently 9.3%)

AI Cost Optimization

Cost Trends (Last 6 Months):

Month	AI Uses	Total Cost	Cost/Use	Optimization Impact
June	62,400	$14,200	$0.228	Baseline
July	68,800	$14,850	$0.216	-5.3% (caching)
Aug	78,400	$16,400	$0.209	-8.3%
Sep	85,200	$17,600	$0.207	-9.2%
Oct	91,800	$18,500	$0.202	-11.4%
Nov	98,500	$19,200	$0.195	-14.5%

Optimization Strategies:

Response Caching: 28% cache hit rate saves $2,400/month
Prompt Optimization: Shorter prompts save $800/month
Batch Processing: Group requests save $600/month
Model Selection: Use smaller models where appropriate

Future Optimizations:

Implement semantic caching (expected +15% hit rate)
Fine-tune custom model (expected -25% cost)
Compress prompts further (expected -8% cost)

Feature Engagement Metrics

Feature Stickiness (DAU/MAU)

Feature Stickiness Rankings:

Feature	DAU	MAU	Stickiness	Category
Progress Tracking	1,850	3,200	58%	Highly sticky
Auto-Grading	1,680	2,980	56%	Highly sticky
AI Lesson Planner	1,245	2,560	49%	Sticky
Dashboard	2,840	5,800	49%	Sticky
Quiz Generator	1,080	2,360	46%	Moderately sticky
Resource Library	745	1,960	38%	Moderately sticky
Student Analytics	520	1,440	36%	Moderately sticky
Curriculum Alignment	425	1,700	25%	Low stickiness
Parent Portal	280	1,080	26%	Low stickiness
Live Collaboration	185	940	20%	Low stickiness

Insights:

High stickiness (>45%): Daily habit features (grading, tracking)
Medium stickiness (30-45%): Regular use features (planning, quizzes)
Low stickiness (<30%): Occasional use features (alignment, collaboration)

Improvement Opportunities:

Parent Portal: Add weekly summaries to drive daily parent engagement
Live Collaboration: Promote for daily teacher planning meetings
Curriculum Alignment: Integrate into lesson planner workflow

Feature Retention Impact

90-Day Retention by Feature Usage:

Feature	Users	90-Day Retention	vs Baseline	Impact
Auto-Grading	112 schools	96%	+8%	Very High
AI Lesson Planner	128 schools	94%	+6%	High
Progress Tracking	95 schools	93%	+5%	High
Quiz Generator	118 schools	92%	+4%	High
Curriculum Alignment	106 schools	91%	+3%	Medium
Student Analytics	72 schools	90%	+2%	Medium
Resource Library	98 schools	89%	+1%	Low
Parent Portal	78 schools	88%	0%	Neutral
Live Collaboration	68 schools	87%	-1%	Neutral
Baseline (no features)	-	88%	-	-

Strategic Implication: Focus on driving adoption of high-retention-impact features (Auto-Grading, AI Lesson Planner, Progress Tracking)

Feature Combination Analysis

Most Common Feature Bundles:

Bundle	Schools	Retention	Avg ARPU	Tier Distribution
Planner + Quiz + Grading	85	98%	$2,400	70% Pro, 30% Ent
Full AI Suite (6 features)	42	99%	$3,100	80% Ent, 20% Pro
Teaching Core (Planner + Resources)	68	91%	$1,650	60% Pro, 40% Ess
Analytics Bundle (Student + Progress)	52	93%	$1,900	75% Pro, 25% Ent

Feature Synergies:

Lesson Planner + Quiz Generator: 82% who use one adopt the other
Auto-Grading + Progress Tracking: 75% co-adoption
Student Analytics + Parent Portal: 68% co-adoption

Feature ROI Analysis

Development Cost vs Impact

Feature	Dev Cost	Ongoing Cost/Month	Adoption	Revenue Impact	ROI
AI Lesson Planner	$45,000	$7,450	88%	+$138,240/mo	3,075%
Auto-Grading	$62,000	$3,420	77%	+$120,960/mo	1,951%
Quiz Generator	$38,000	$5,280	81%	+$130,680/mo	3,439%
Progress Tracking	$28,000	$800	66%	+$95,760/mo	3,420%
Student Analytics	$52,000	$1,200	50%	+$62,400/mo	1,200%
Parent Portal	$42,000	$600	54%	+$68,400/mo	1,629%
Live Collaboration	$75,000	$2,400	47%	+$58,320/mo	778%

ROI Calculation: (Annual Revenue Impact - Annual Ongoing Cost) / Development Cost

Insights:

Quiz Generator has highest ROI (low dev cost, high adoption)
Live Collaboration has lowest ROI (high dev cost, medium adoption)
All features have positive ROI >700%

Future Investment Priorities:

High adoption, high impact: Invest in improvements
Low adoption, high potential: Invest in marketing/onboarding
Low adoption, low impact: Consider sunset or pivot

Feature Roadmap Impact

Recently Launched Features (Last 6 Months)

Live Collaboration (Launched Sep 1, 2025):

Day 30 Adoption: 35% (target: 30%) 🟢
Day 60 Adoption: 47% (target: 40%) 🟢
Day 90 Adoption: 47% (target: 50%) 🟡

Adoption Curve:
Week 1:  12% ███░░░░░░░
Week 4:  25% ███████░░░
Week 8:  35% ██████████
Week 12: 47% █████████████

Status: Plateauing, need activation campaign

Student Analytics (Launched Jul 15, 2025):

Day 30 Adoption: 28%
Day 60 Adoption: 42%
Day 90 Adoption: 50% (target achieved) 🟢

Exceeded Expectations: Yes
Strong word-of-mouth driving adoption

Parent Portal (Launched Jun 1, 2025):

Day 30 Adoption: 42%
Day 60 Adoption: 52%
Day 120 Adoption: 54% (target: 50%) 🟢

Mature Feature: Growth slowing, focus on engagement

Planned Features (Next 6 Months)

Feature	Priority	Target Launch	Expected Adoption	Revenue Impact
Assessment Builder	High	Jan 2026	70%	+$85K MRR
Video Lessons	High	Feb 2026	65%	+$72K MRR
Attendance Tracking	Medium	Mar 2026	80%	+$45K MRR
Mobile App (iOS/Android)	Medium	Apr 2026	55%	+$38K MRR
Advanced Reporting	Low	May 2026	45%	+$28K MRR
API Access (Enterprise)	Low	Jun 2026	15%	+$42K MRR

Feature Health Monitoring

Weekly Feature Health Scorecard

Scoring Criteria:

Adoption (30%): % of schools using feature monthly
Engagement (25%): DAU/MAU stickiness
Satisfaction (20%): User ratings
Retention Impact (15%): Effect on customer retention
Revenue Impact (10%): MRR contribution

Current Health Scores (Max 100):

Feature	Health Score	Status	Action Needed
AI Lesson Planner	94	🟢 Excellent	Maintain
Auto-Grading	92	🟢 Excellent	Maintain
Smart Quiz Generator	89	🟢 Good	Minor improvements
Progress Tracking	86	🟢 Good	Maintain
Curriculum Alignment	78	🟡 Acceptable	Improve engagement
Resource Library	75	🟡 Acceptable	Improve discovery
Student Analytics	72	🟡 Acceptable	Drive adoption
Plagiarism Checker	68	🟡 Needs attention	Improve quality
Parent Portal	65	🟠 Concerning	Activation campaign
Live Collaboration	58	🟠 Concerning	Major improvements needed

Alert Thresholds:

<50: Critical, consider major overhaul or sunset
50-70: Concerning, needs improvement
70-85: Acceptable, minor optimizations
85+: Good/Excellent, maintain or enhance